




|
|
| History of
Mesopotamia is the history of the region in southwestern Asia where the
world's earliest civilization developed. The name comes from a Greek
word meaning "between rivers," referring to the land between the Tigris
and Euphrates rivers, but the region can be broadly defined to include
the area that is now eastern Syria, southeastern Turkey, and most of
Iraq. The region was the centre of a culture whose influence extended
throughout the Middle East and as far as the Indus valley, Egypt, and
the Mediterranean. In the narrow sense, Mesopotamia is the area between
the Euphrates and Tigris rivers, north or northwest of the bottleneck at
Baghdad, in modern Iraq; it is Al-Jazirah ("The Island") of the Arabs.
South of this lies Babylonia, named after the city of Babylon. However,
in the broader sense, the name Mesopotamia has come to be used for the
area bounded on the northeast by the Zagros Mountains and on the
southwest by the edge of the Arabian Plateau and stretching from the
Arabic Gulf in the southeast to the spurs of the Anti-Taurus Mountains
in the northwest. Only from the latitude of Baghdad do the Euphrates and
Tigris truly become twin rivers, the rafidan of the Arabs, which have
constantly changed their courses over the millennia. The low-lying plain
of the Karun River in Persia has always been closely related to
Mesopotamia, but it is not considered part of Mesopotamia as it forms
its own river system. Mesopotamia, south of Ar-Ramadi (about 70 miles,
or 110 kilometres, west of Baghdad) on the Euphrates and the bend of the
Tigris below Samarra' (about 70 miles north-northwest of Baghdad), is
flat alluvial land. Between Baghdad and the mouth of the Shatt al-'Arab
(the confluence of the Tigris and Euphrates, where it empties into the
Arabic Gulf) there is a difference in height of only about 100 feet (30 metres). As a result of the slow flow of the water, there are heavy
deposits of silt, and the riverbeds are raised. Consequently, the rivers
often overflow their banks (and may even change their course) when they
are not protected by high dikes. In recent times they have been
regulated above Baghdad by the use of escape channels with overflow
reservoirs. The extreme south is a region of extensive marshes and reed
swamps, hawrs, which, probably since early times, have served as an area
of refuge for oppressed and displaced peoples. The supply of water is
not regular; as a result of the high average temperatures and a very low
annual rainfall, the ground of the plain of latitude 35 N is hard and
dry and unsuitable for plant cultivation for at least eight months in
the year. Consequently, agriculture without risk of crop failure, which
seems to have begun in the higher rainfall zones and in the hilly
borders of Mesopotamia in the 10th millennium BC, began in Mesopotamia
itself, the real heart of the civilization, only after artificial
irrigation had been invented, bringing water to large stretches of
territory through a widely branching network of canals. Since the ground
is extremely fertile and, with irrigation and the necessary drainage,
will produce in abundance, southern Mesopotamia became a land of plenty
that could support a considerable population. The cultural superiority
of north Mesopotamia, which may have lasted until about 4000 BC, was
finally overtaken by the south when the people there had responded to
the challenge of their situation. The present climatic conditions are
fairly similar to those of 8,000 years ago. An English survey of ruined
settlements in the area 30 miles around ancient Hatra (180 miles
northwest of Baghdad) has shown that the southern limits of the zone in
which agriculture is possible without artificial irrigation has remained
unchanged since the first settlement of Al-Jazirah. The availability of
raw materials is a historical factor of great importance, as is the
dependence on those materials that had to be imported. In Mesopotamia,
agricultural products and those from stock breeding, fisheries, date
palm cultivation, and reed industries--in short, grain, vegetables,
meat, leather, wool, horn, fish, dates, and reed and plant-fibre
products--were available in plenty and could easily be produced in
excess of home requirements to be exported. There are bitumen springs at
Hit (90 miles northwest of Baghdad) on the Euphrates (the Is of
Herodotus). On the other hand, wood, stone, and metal were rare or even
entirely absent. The date palm--virtually the national tree of
Iraq--yields a wood suitable only for rough beams and not for finer
work. Stone is mostly lacking in southern Mesopotamia, although
limestone is quarried in the desert about 35 miles to the west and "Mosul
marble" is found not far from the Tigris in its middle reaches. Metal
can only be obtained in the mountains, and the same is true of precious
and semiprecious stones. Consequently, southern Mesopotamia in
particular was destined to be a land of trade from the start. Only
rarely could "empires" extending over a wider area guarantee themselves
imports by plundering or by subjecting neighbouring regions. The raw
material that epitomizes Mesopotamian civilization is clay: in the
almost exclusively mud-brick architecture and in the number and variety
of clay figurines and pottery artifacts, Mesopotamia bears the stamp of
clay as does no other civilization, and nowhere in the world but in
Mesopotamia and the regions over which its influence was diffused was
clay used as the vehicle for writing. Such phrases as cuneiform
civilization, cuneiform literature, and cuneiform law can apply only
where people had had the idea of using soft clay not only for bricks and
jars and for the jar stoppers on which a seal could be impressed as a
mark of ownership but also as the vehicle for impressed signs to which
established meanings were assigned--an intellectual achievement that
amounted to nothing less than the invention of writing.
BABYLON
Babylonian Bab-ilu, Old Babylonian Bab-ilim, Hebrew
Bavel, or Babel, Arabic Atlal Babil, one of the most famous cities of
antiquity. It was the capital of southern Mesopotamia (Babylonia) from
the early 2nd millennium to the early 1st millennium BC and capital of
the Neo-Babylonian (Chaldean) Empire in the 7th and 6th centuries BC,
when it was at the height of its splendour. Its extensive ruins on the
Euphrates River about 55 miles (88 kilometres) south of Baghdad lie near
the modern town of al-Hillah, Iraq.Though traces of prehistoric
settlement exist, Babylon's development as a major city was late by
Mesopotamian standards, no mention of it occurring before the 23rd
century BC. After the fall of the 3rd dynasty of Ur, under which Babylon
had been a provincial centre, it became the nucleus of a small kingdom
established in 1894 BC by the Amorite king Sumuabum, whose successors
consolidated its status. The sixth and best known of the Amorite
dynasts, Hammurabi (1792-50 BC), conquered the surrounding city-states
and raised Babylon to the capital of a kingdom comprising all southern
Mesopotamia and part of Assyria (northern Iraq). Its political
importance, together with its favourable geographical position, made it
henceforth the main commercial and administrative centre of Babylonia,
while its wealth and prestige made it a target for foreign conquerors.
After a Hittite raid in 1595 BC, the city passed to the control of the
Kassites (c. 1570), who established a dynasty lasting more than four
centuries. Later in this period, Babylon became a literary and religious
centre, the prestige of which was reflected in the elevation of Marduk,
its chief god, to supremacy in Mesopotamia. In 1234 Tukulti-Ninurta I of
Assyria took Babylon, though subsequently the Kassite dynasty reasserted
itself until 1158, when the city was sacked by the Elamites. Babylon's
acknowledged political supremacy is shown by the fact that the dynasty
of Nebuchadrezzar I (1124-03) made it their capital, although they did
not originate there. This dynasty endured for more than a century. Just
before 1000, pressure from Aramaean immigrants from northern Syria
brought administrative dislocation inside Babylon. From this period to
the fall of Assyria in the late 7th century BC, there was a continual
struggle between Aramaean or associated Chaldean tribesmen and the
Assyrians for political control of the city. Its citizens claimed
privileges, such as exemption from forced labour, certain taxes, and
imprisonment, which the Assyrians, with a similar background, were
usually readier to recognize than were immigrant tribesmen. Furthermore,
the citizens, grown wealthy by commerce, benefitted by an imperial power
able to protect international trade but suffered economically from
disruptive tribesmen. Such circumstances made Babylon usually prefer
Assyrian to Aramaean or Chaldean rule. From the 9th to the late 7th
century Babylon was almost continuously under Assyrian suzerainty,
usually wielded through native kings, though sometimes Assyrian kings
ruled in person. Close Assyrian involvement in Babylon began with
Tiglath-pileser III (744-727 BC) as a result of Chaldean tribesmen
pressing into city territories, several times usurping the kingship.
Disorders accompanying increasing tribal occupation finally persuaded
Sennacherib (704-681 BC) that peaceful control of Babylon was
impossible, and in 689 he ordered destruction of the city. Esarhaddon
(680-669 BC) rescinded Sennacherib's policy, and, after expelling the
tribesmen and returning the property of the Babylonians to them,
undertook the rebuilding of the city; but the image of Marduk, removed
by Sennacherib, was retained in Assyria throughout his reign, probably
to prevent any potential usurper from using it to claim the kingship. In
the mid-7th century, civil war broke out between the Assyrian king
Ashurbanipal and his brother who ruled in Babylonia as sub-king.
Ashurbanipal laid siege to the city, which fell to him in 648 after
famine had driven the defenders to cannibalism. After Ashurbanipal's
death, a Chaldean leader, Nabopolassar, in 626 made Babylon the capital
of a kingdom that under his son Nebuchadrezzar II became a major
imperial power. Nebuchadrezzar undertook a vast program of rebuilding
and fortification in Babylon, labour gangs from many lands increasing
the mixture of the population. Nebuchadrezzar's most important
successor, Nabonidus, campaigned in Arabia for a decade, leaving his son
Belshazzar as regent in Babylon. Nabonidus failed to protect property
rights or religious traditions of the capital and attempted building
operations elsewhere to rival Marduk's great temple of Esagila. When the
Persians under Cyrus attacked in 539 BC, the capital fell almost without
resistance; a legend (accepted by some as historical) that Cyrus
achieved entry by diverting the Euphrates is unconfirmed in contemporary
sources. Under the Persians, Babylon retained most of its institutions,
became capital of the richest satrapy in the empire, and, according to
Herodotus, the world's most splendid city. A revolt against Xerxes I
(482) led to destruction of its fortifications and temples and the
melting down of the golden image of Marduk. In 331 Babylon surrendered
to Alexander the Great, who confirmed its privileges and ordered the
restoration of the temples. Alexander, recognizing the commercial
importance of the city, allowed its satrap to issue coinage and began
construction of a harbour to foster trade. In 323 Alexander died in the
palace of Nebuchadrezzar; he had planned to make Babylon his imperial
capital. Alexander's conquest brought Babylon into the orbit of Greek
culture, and Hellenistic science was greatly enriched by the
contributions of Babylonian astronomy. After a power struggle among
Alexander's generals, Babylon passed to the Seleucid dynasty in 312. The
city's importance was much reduced by the building of a new capital,
Seleucia, on the Tigris, to which part of Babylon's population was
transferred in 275.
RECENT HISTORY
In 600 Iraq was a province of the Persian Sasanian
empire, to which it had belonged for the previous three centuries. It
was probably the most populous and wealthy area in the Middle East, and
the intensive irrigation agriculture of the lower Tigris and Euphrates
and of tributaries such as the Diyala and Karun formed the main resource
base of the Sasanian monarchy. The term Iraq was not used at this time;
in the mid-6th century the Sasanian empire was divided by Khosrow I into
four quarters, of which the western one, called Khvarvaran, included
most of modern Iraq.
The term Iraq is widely used in the medieval Arabic
sources for the area in the centre and south of the modern republic as a
geographic rather than a political term, implying no precise boundaries.
The area of modern Iraq north of Tikrit was known in Muslim times as Al-Jazirah,
which means "The Island" and refers to the "island" between the Tigris
and Euphrates rivers. To the south and west lay the Arabian deserts,
inhabited largely by Arab tribesmen who occasionally acknowledged the
overlordship of the Sasanian kings. Until 602 the desert frontier had
been guarded by the Lakhmid kings of Al-Hira, who were themselves Arabs
but who ruled a settled buffer state. In that year Khosrow II Parviz
rashly abolished the Lakhmid kingdom and laid the frontier open to nomad
incursions. Farther north the western quarter was bounded by the
Byzantine Empire. The frontier more or less followed the modern
Syria-Iraq border and continued northward into modern Turkey, leaving
Nisibis (modern Nusaybin) as the Sasanian frontier fortress while the
Byzantines held Dara and nearby Amida (modern Diyarbakr).
The inhabitants were very mixed. There was an
aristocratic and administrative Persian upper class, but most of the
population were Aramaic-speaking peasants. There were a considerable
number of Arabs, most of whom lived as pastoralists along the western
margins of the settled lands, but some lived as townspeople, especially
in Al-Hira. In addition, there were Kurds, who lived along the foothills
of the Zagros Mountains, and a surprisingly large number of Greeks,
mostly prisoners captured during the numerous Sasanian campaigns into
Byzantine Syria.
Ethnic diversity was matched by religious pluralism.
The Sasanian state religion, Zoroastrianism, was largely confined to the
Persian ruling class. The majority of the population, especially in the
northern part of the country, were probably Christians. These were
sharply divided by doctrinal differences into Monophysites, linked to
the Jacobite church of Syria, and Nestorians. The Nestorians were the
most widespread and were tolerated by the Sasanian kings because of
their opposition to the Christians of the Roman Empire, who regarded the
Nestorians as heretics. The Monophysites were regarded with more
suspicion and were occasionally persecuted, but both groups were able to
maintain an ecclesiastical hierarchy, and the Nestorians had an
important intellectual centre at Nisibis. The area around the ancient
city of Babylon by this time had a large population of Jews, both
descendants of the exiles of Old Testament times and local converts. In
addition, in the southern half of the country there were numerous
adherents of the old Babylonian paganism, as well as Mandaeans and
Gnostics.
In the early 7th century the stability and prosperity
of this multicultural society were threatened by invasion. In 602
Khosrow II Parviz launched the last great Persian invasion of the
Byzantine Empire. At first he was spectacularly successful; Syria and
Egypt fell, and Constantinople itself was threatened. Later the tide
began to turn, and in 627-628 the Byzantines, under the leadership of
the emperor Heraclius, invaded Iraq and sacked the imperial capital at
Ctesiphon. The invaders did not remain, but Khosrow was discredited,
deposed, and executed. There followed a period of infighting among
generals and members of the royal family that left the country without
clear leadership. The chaos had also damaged irrigation systems, and it
was probably at this time that large areas in the south of the country
reverted to marshlands, which they have remained ever since. It was with
this devastated land that the earliest Muslim raiders came into contact.
The first conflict between local Bedouin tribes and
Sasanian forces seems to have been in 634, when the Arabs were defeated
at the Battle of the Bridge. There a force of some 5,000 Muslims under
Abu 'Ubayd ath-Thaqafi was routed by the Persians. In 637 a much larger
Muslim force under Sa'd ibn Abi Waqqas defeated the main Persian army at
the battle of Al-Qadisiyya and moved on to sack Ctesiphon. By the end of
the following year (638), the Muslims had conquered almost all of Iraq,
and the last Sasanian king, Yazdegerd III, had fled to Iran, where he
was killed in 651.
The Muslim conquest was followed by mass immigration
of Arabs from eastern Arabia and Oman. These new arrivals did not
disperse and settle throughout the country; instead they established two
new garrison cities, at Al-Kufah, near ancient Babylon, and at Basra in
the south. The intention was that the Muslims should be a separate
community of fighting men and their families living off taxes paid by
the local inhabitants. In the north of the country, Mosul began to
emerge as the most important city and the base of a Muslim governor and
garrison. Apart from the Persian elite and the Zoroastrian priests,
whose property was confiscated, most of the local people were allowed to
keep their possessions and their religion.
Iraq now became a province of the Muslim Caliphate,
which stretched from North Africa and later Spain in the west to Sind
(now southern Pakistan) in the east. At first the capital of the
Caliphate was at Madinah (Medina), but, after the murder of the third
caliph, 'Uthman, in 656, his successor, the Prophet's cousin and
son-in-law 'Ali, made Iraq his base. In 661, however, 'Ali was murdered
in Al-Kufah, and the caliphate passed to the rival Umayyad family in
Syria. Iraq became a subordinate province, even though it was the
richest area of the Muslim world and the one with the largest Muslim
population. This situation gave rise to continual discontent with
Umayyad rule; this discontent was in various forms.
In 680 'Ali's son al-Husayn arrived in Iraq from
Madinah, hoping that the people of Al-Kufah would support him. They
failed to act, and his small group of followers was massacred at Karbala',
but his memory lingered on as a source of inspiration for all who
opposed the Umayyads. In later centuries, Karbala' and 'Ali's tomb at
nearby An-Najaf became important centres of Shi'ite pilgrimage and are
still greatly revered today. The Iraqis had their opportunity after the
death in 683 of the caliph Yazid I when the Umayyads faced threats from
many quarters. In Al-Kufah the initiative was taken by al-Mukhtar ibn
Abi 'Ubayd, who was supported by many mawali, non-Arab converts to Islam
who felt they were treated as second-class citizens. Al-Mukhtar was
killed in 687, but the Umayyads realized that strict rule was required.
The caliph 'Abd al-Malik (685-705) appointed the fearsome al-Hajjaj ibn
Yusuf as his governor in Iraq and all of the east. Al-Hajjaj became a
legend as a stern but just ruler. His firm measures aroused the
opposition of the local Arab elite, and in 701 there was a massive
rebellion led by Muhammad ibn al-Ash'ath. The insurrection was defeated
only with the aid of Syrian soldiers. Iraq was now very much a conquered
province, and al-Hajjaj established a new city at Wasit, halfway between
Al-Kufah and Basra, to be a base for a permanent Syrian garrison. In a
more positive way, he encouraged Iraqis to join the expeditions led by
Qutaybah ibn Muslim that between 705 and 715 conquered what is now
Central Asia for Islam. Even after al-Hajjaj's death in 714, the
Umayyad-Syrian grip on Iraq remained firm, and resentment was
widespread.
Opposition to the Umayyads finally came to a head in
northeastern Iran (Khorasan) in 747 when the mawla Abu Muslim raised
black banners in the name of the 'Abbasids, a branch of the family of
the Prophet, distantly related to 'Ali and his descendants. In 749 the
armies from the east reached Iraq, where they received the support of
much of the population. The 'Abbasids themselves came from their retreat
at Humaymah in southern Jordan, and in 749 the first 'Abbasid caliph,
as-Saffah, was proclaimed in the mosque at Al-Kufah. This " 'Abbasid
Revolution" ushered in the golden age of medieval Iraq. Khorasan was too
much on the fringes of the Muslim world to be a suitable capital, and
from the beginning the 'Abbasid caliphs made Iraq their base. By this
time Islam had spread well beyond the original garrison towns, even
though Muslims were still a minority of the population.
During the period from 1055 to 1534, the term "Iraq"
('Iraq) referred to two distinct geopolitical regions. The first,
qualified as Arabian Iraq ('Iraq 'arabi), denoted the area roughly
corresponding to ancient Mesopotamia or the modern nation of Iraq and
consisted of Upper Iraq or Al-Jazirah and Lower Iraq or As-Sawad ("The
Black [Lands]"). The town of Tikrit was traditionally considered to mark
the border between these two entities. The second region, lying to the
east of Arabian Iraq and separated from it by the Zagros mountain range,
was called Persian Iraq ('Iraq 'ajami) and was more or less identical
with ancient Media or the Umayyad and 'Abbasid province of Jibal.
Together these regions became known as "the Two Iraqs," in
contradistinction to the previous usage of the term in reference to the
towns of Basra and Al-Kufah, the two major urban settlements of Lower
Iraq in early Islamic times. In addition, Arabian Iraq was subdivided
into three political spheres: Upper Iraq, centred on the town of Mosul;
Middle Iraq, or the area around Baghdad; and Lower Iraq, whose major
centres were the towns of Al-Hillah, Wasit, and Basra. Upper Iraq had
strong political ties to the provinces of Diyar Bakr and Diyar Rabi'a in
eastern Anatolia and northern Syria as well as with Azerbaijan; Middle
and Lower Iraq were bound politically both to Azerbaijan and to Persian
Iraq. Traditionally all three spheres were subject to pressures from the
greater powers of the Iranian plateau and the Nile valley.
When the Ottoman Empire was dismembered following
World War I and the boundaries of the 20th-century state of Iraq were
drawn, they bore little resemblance to those of the provinces of Ottoman
Iraq. Nor had the name Iraq been attached to any of those provinces.
Ottoman Iraq was roughly approximate to the Arabian Iraq of the
preceding era, but without clearly defined borders. The Zagros
Mountains, which separated Arabian Iraq from Persian Iraq, now lay on
the Ottoman-Iranian frontier, but that frontier shifted with the
fortunes of war. On the west and south, Iraq faded out somewhere in the
sands of the Syrian and Arabian deserts. The incorporation of Arabian
Iraq into the Ottoman Empire not only separated it from Persian Iraq but
also reoriented it toward the Ottoman lands in Syria and Anatolia, with
especially close ties binding the province (eyalet) of Diyar Bakr to the
Iraqi provinces. For administrative purposes, Ottoman Iraq was divided
into the three central eyalets of Mosul, Baghdad, and Basra, with the
northern eyalet of Shahrizor, east of the Tigris, and the southern
eyalet of Al-Hasa, on the western coast of the Arabic
Gulf. These
provinces only roughly reflected the geographic, linguistic, and
religious divisions of Ottoman Iraq. Most of the inhabitants of Mosul
and Shahrizor in the north and northeast were Kurds and other non-Arabs.
Pastures and cultivated fields benefited from the plentiful rainfall and
melting winter snows of this largely mountainous region. The Tigris and
Euphrates rivers flowing through the central and southern plains created
an irregular belt of irrigated farmlands bounded by desert and merging
into the marshlands around the head of the Arabic Gulf. The people of
the plains, marshes, and deserts were overwhelmingly Arabic-speaking.
Few Turkish speakers were to be found outside of Baghdad, Kirkuk, and
some other towns. Centuries of political upheavals, invasions, wars, and
general insecurity had taken their toll on Iraq's population, especially
in the urban centres. Destruction and neglect of the irrigation system
had restricted settled agriculture to a few areas, the most extensive of
which were between the rivers north of Baghdad and around Basra in the
south. As much as half of the Arab and Kurdish population in the
countryside was nomadic or seminomadic. Outside the towns, social
organization and personal allegiances were primarily tribal, with many
of the settled cultivators having retained their tribal ties. Baghdad,
situated near the geographic centre, reflected within itself the
division between the predominantly Shi'ite south and the largely Sunnite
north. Unlike Anatolia and Syria, Iraq's non-Muslim communities were
modest in size, but there was an active Jewish commercial and financial
element in Baghdad, and Assyrian Christians were prominent in Mosul.
Absorbed piecemeal by the Ottoman sultans Selim I and Süleyman I in the
16th century, this region on the empire's eastern periphery was the
battleground in recurrent struggles between the Sunnite Ottomans and the
Shi'ite rulers of Iran and was subject to frequent Arab and Kurdish
tribal disturbances. It was never as thoroughly integrated into the
empire or as directly administered by the Ottomans as was the western
half of the Fertile Crescent. Nevertheless, bearing in mind the
destruction, chaos, and fragmentation that had beset the region in the
preceding centuries, the expansion of the vast Ottoman political and
economic sphere to include Iraq brought with it certain advantages.
Under the watchful eye of Süleyman I's government, local administration
was reorganized; trade increased; the economic and living conditions of
most of the inhabitants improved; and the towns, especially Baghdad,
experienced some growth and new building. The Ottomans at first
attempted to rule the Iraqi provinces directly, but in the 17th and 18th
centuries a weakened government in Istanbul was obliged to concede
extensive autonomy to the governors, and some areas were beyond the
reach of Ottoman authority for extended periods. This trend was reversed
in the 19th century when administrative centralization and
reorganization, undertaken by the Ottoman government as part of a
comprehensive reform and modernization program, were extended to Iraq.
The reassertion of direct rule by the sultan's government did not,
however, halt the increasing penetration of Iraq by British and other
European interests. |
|
| |
|
|